Nashville Public Radio reports that Republican state legislators, in an effort to demonstrate the strain that refugee services place on the tax-paying public, requested that the state Fiscal Review Committee investigate the impact of refuge resettlement in Tennessee. The answer? Refugees pay $37 million more in taxes than in services they receive. In other words, refugees are the tax-paying public. Legislators’ response? Reject the study. State Rep. Joe Carr (R-Lascassas) says, “We don’t know if it’s flawed. But we don’t know if it’s accurate. So if we don’t know if it’s accurate or flawed, what was the point of the study?” I think it’s clear what the point of the study was thought to be; it is just as clear that reality doesn’t support the premise. By the way, this isn’t the first time that state legislators have been rebuffed by the facts on immigration economics. Peruse this blog back five or six years and you’ll read about a prior state legislative hearing that ended much the same way.
- 3 Things to Know About Changes to the H-1B Visa Program
- What Are the Proposed Changes to the Public Charge Rule?
- Immigrants Seeking Citizenship via Military Service Face Tougher Restrictions
- The 30/60-Day Rule is Now the 90-Day Rule
- 3 Things to Know about President Trump’s Rescission of DACA
- New GOP-Authored Bill Seeks to Halve Legal Immigration to the U.S.
1966 Act 2017 Diversity Visa Lottery action for parents of americans advance parole American Opportunity Tax Credit application Child Tax Credit court decision cuban daca dapa deadline dry foot E-Verify EB-5 Entrepreneurs executive orders fee fiance Foreign h-1b homeland security imm Immigration Reform Updates International Investment Visa IRS ITIN medical N-400 N-600 naturalization parole process program provisional restrictions TEA Trump unlawful presence USCIS visa visa waiver waiver wet foot