Nashville Public Radio reports that Republican state legislators, in an effort to demonstrate the strain that refugee services place on the tax-paying public, requested that the state Fiscal Review Committee investigate the impact of refuge resettlement in Tennessee. The answer? Refugees pay $37 million more in taxes than in services they receive. In other words, refugees are the tax-paying public. Legislators’ response? Reject the study. State Rep. Joe Carr (R-Lascassas) says, “We don’t know if it’s flawed. But we don’t know if it’s accurate. So if we don’t know if it’s accurate or flawed, what was the point of the study?” I think it’s clear what the point of the study was thought to be; it is just as clear that reality doesn’t support the premise. By the way, this isn’t the first time that state legislators have been rebuffed by the facts on immigration economics. Peruse this blog back five or six years and you’ll read about a prior state legislative hearing that ended much the same way.
Call: (865) 470-0788
Contact Us For Help! Contáctenos para obtener ayuda!
IMMIGRATION SERVICES
IMMIGRATION NEWS
- Homeland Security announces extension and redesignation of Venezuela for temporary protected status.
- DHS Modernizes Cuban and Haitian Family Reunification Parole Processes
- Temporary Protected Status Designated Country: El Salvador
- Immigration Services Suspended In-Person Services Until June 4
- Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility
- Application of Expedited Removal Expands under Trump Administration
TOPICS
1966 Act
action for parents of americans
advance parole
American Opportunity Tax Credit
application
Child Tax Credit
court decision
Covid-19
Covid19
cuban
daca
dapa
deadline
dry foot
E-Verify
EB-5
Entrepreneurs
executive orders
fee
fiance
Foreign
h-1b
homeland security
imm
Immigration Reform Updates
International
Investment Visa
IRS
ITIN
N-400
N-600
naturalization
parole
process
program
provisional
restrictions
TEA
Trump
unlawful presence
USCIS
visa
visa waiver
waiver
wet foot